This issue is celebrating our 100th PréCiS – 2021 Summer issue.
We have a number of CiS members sharing their memories of various events and changes during those 25 years :-
We hope you enjoy reading it.
Good news we have a number of live events. Some events will continue to have the option to participate online, you can join in wherever you are. Enjoy reading the CiS September Update
Inside the Update we have details on:-
CONGRATULATIONS – Sir Colin Humphreys – winner Royal Medal 2021
CiS Autumn Conference: Climate Emergency – a Christian Response
Saturday 16th October
Emmanuel Croydon, Normanton Rd, South Croydon CR2 7AF
This event is in person plus live streaming via zoom
Bookings are open via Eventbrite.
Plus Other News, Events and Prayer Focus
Sadly Revd Canon Dr John Polkinghorne KBE FRS passed away in Cambridge in March 2021, aged 90. A number of CiS members and friends share their memories of John:-
I was sad to hear of the death of John Polkinghorne because he had had such a wonderful and effective life that many will miss. I new John in a slightly different way to many other members because when I became a vicar in Bristol in 1984 I inherited John as my curate. He had left trained and become ordained with the long term purpose of seeking a ministry that helped people understand the compatibility of both modern scientific understanding and his firm Christian faith not as two separate areas but as one human experience. To become a full clergyman and to earth his theology John served as a curate in a largely working class parish in inner Bristol. I took over as Vicar there for the last year of this curacy before he moved to a small parish in Kent and began writing his series of books that many of us have appreciated. I found him a very humble man with a good pastoral heart. At our first staff meeting he said he had been invited as a fellow of the Royal Society to speak at an international conference in the South of France but had said he would have to wait for the arrival of his new boss before he could accept! His warmth of personality and the medical problems he was suffering at the time endeared him to parishioners as he engaged at a very human level. He found it a great opportunity to hone his skills in expressing complicated ideas in ways ordinary people could understand.
He was an inspiration to me as a former chemist and I went on in my ministry to run courses in my parishes on issues of science and faith and the spirituality that could embrace both.So many seemed ignorant of both Christian understanding and current scientific thought. In retirement I have concentrated on helping youth leaders understand how they can answer the questions of young people about science and faith. I shall continue to treasure both the privilege and inspiration I derived from getting to know John.
For me as a young scientist, Sir Prof. Rev. John Polkinghorne provided “proof” that there was no contradiction between being a respected scientist and a christian. His intelligence, his sincerity and the ability to communicate both at once left a lasting impression on me. He was undoubtedly a leading light of his generation, but also worked hard to ensure that the flame would be passed onto the next.
Sad news but a man of gentleness and integrity with great hope. I have found his thoughts on eschatology from a scientific perspective really helpful, and not many others have engaged with that. I attended a lecture of his at the Sheffield Theological Society in the early nineties which got me going in my thinking around Science and Faith.
John was our Reader at Holy Trinity Cambridge in the 1970s, while still Professor of Mathematical Physics at the University. His sermons were a model of spiritual warmth and intellectual rigour, with a remarkable humility and transparency in sharing himself and the quest for truth. He later proved to be a winsome and compelling evangelist with his ‘bottom-up’ thinking about God in an age which has difficulty contemplating the transcendent. His first foray into writing on Science and Faith, ‘The Way The World Is’ (SPCK Triangle, 1983) was a game-changer in bridging the perceived gap between the two, and hailed by the Church Times reviewer David L Edwards as one of his best books of the year.
I had read some of his books but never had the chance to meet him. Lots to discuss in glory.
He was a wonderful man and I went to hear him speak. He was a great scientist, and portrayed his love of Christ to many as well. He will be missed.
From a personal perspective, John Polkinghorne has been my hero since I first read a book by him when I was a teenager. When first met him as an undergraduate student I was amazed by the respectful way he talked with me, despite my lack of experience compared to his. Every time I have been privileged to have met him, I have been impressed, not only by his wisdom but also by his grace. He has done so much for our community of scientists who are Christians and I thank God for his life & work. I am sure that the legacy he leaves us with in his writings and videos will continue to inspire generations to come.
John Polkinghorne has been a constant in my working life and instrumental to how I think about the relationships between science and religion. I’m only one of thousands who have been impressed and affected by his work. I’m also in a very crowded club of people who have benefitted from attending John’s talks.
John Polkinghorne was knighted in 1997 for distinguished service to science, religion, learning, and medical ethics. He has also received the Templeton prize. After working in physics for a very long time (25 years) John then became a Priest. John said that the aim of his intellectual explorations – as a physicist and as a priest – was to bring these parts together – without compartmentalism.
I work in education and you will find John’s name on BBC Bitesize as well as in numerous curriculum documents and on exam specifications. I think John’s ideas are so loved and widely shared in education not only because they are inspirational and significant but also because his writing is engaging and accessible.
John talked about fine tuning and he painted pictures with words about what would happen if the stars were all a bit too big or too small. He described physics and theology as ‘cousins’ and said of their relationship that there are still some puzzles left to be solved. When John talked about science and about God, it was with wonder and mystery and excitement and delight.
John said that his favourite quotes included this one by Bernard Lonergan: ‘God is the all sufficient explanation, the eternal rapture glimpsed in every Archimedean cry of eureka’.
John said about this quote that, “The search for understanding, which is so natural to a scientist is, in the end, the search for God. That is how religion will continue to flourish in this Age of Science.”
Thank you John.
Prof Berry Billingsley
As Christians we express our love for God by showing love to our neighbour and, as Christ taught us in his famous parable of the Good Samaritan, “our neighbour” means anyone we meet, irrespective of their relationship to us. Clearly, loving our neighbour includes not putting them at risk of harm, and we are being told that an important way of protecting those in our community, as well as ourselves, during the current Coronavirus pandemic, is to be vaccinated. Three questions have, however, been circulating that seem to undermine this advice. Is it real? Is it safe? Is it right?
The first question doubts the reality of the pandemic by suggesting that either the pandemic is a hoax or there is a conspiracy to inject the world’s population with some kind of microscopic tracking device in order to control people. Such bizarre ideas spreading on social media, entirely without evidence or rational foundation, are readily debunked by going to trusted and competent advisors. In any case, most of us know the reality of Covid, having had a relative or friend affected by the disease. As Christians we have a responsibility to seek and tell the truth.
The second questions the safety of the vaccine by raising concerns about the speed of its development and possible side-effects. The fact that effective vaccines have been developed within one year of the appearance of the coronavirus is indeed remarkable, but the work did not begin just when this virus was first detected in December 2019. Scientists have been studying viruses and how to produce vaccines for many years and the basic technologies had already been developed so that researchers were ready to apply them once the nature of the coronavirus was analysed. Nonetheless, the scientists, medics and others who produced the vaccines and ensured they were tested properly have done a remarkable job and deserve our thanks and praise for their dedication and hard work. It has also been a cause of thanksgiving that the vaccines have been proven to be remarkably free of adverse side-effects. As vaccines are meant to teach our immune system about a real infection, the aim is to stimulate the immune system to recognise and respond to the Covid virus. This can cause, for some people, a few mild symptoms that for many will go unnoticed and, only extremely rarely, people who are highly allergic (and therefore have an alerted immune system) might have more severe symptoms. No medication can ever be completely 100% free of risk since humanity is so diverse and rare reactions can happen. The key, however, is in understanding the relative risk compared both to other risks we take every day and compared to the benefits to ourselves and others. It is not 100% safe to travel by air or in a car and yet most of us take such risks without much thought. We take medicines such as paracetamol or aspirin in spite of the fact that there is a very small risk to our health by taking them. The COVID-19 vaccines have been found to be safe in the same way as other vaccinations and health treatments and protect from the much bigger risk of a real infection with the virus. Therefore, anyone who is worried can be reassured that it is safe to be vaccinated. If anyone is concerned about a specific precondition that they have, their GP will be able to advise them on their personal risk.
The third question – is it right? – is more complicated and involves our individual conscience. The problem has been raised by claims that the development of the vaccines involved the use of tissue from an aborted human embryo, in either the production or the testing. How should a Christian, or anyone concerned about the morality of abortion, decide whether or not to use something derived from a morally debatable action? It is important, first, to be clear about some facts. No tissue from embryos is used in the production of any of the current vaccines. What happened was that some tissue from a single embryo, aborted for unknown reasons, over 50 years ago was used to create a “cell line”. This process creates a source of new, but not entirely identical, cells that can go on replicating almost indefinitely. All biomedical research depends on cell lines that mimic the biological reality in our own cells. Most of these cell lines were made from cancer cells that originate from real patients, only very few cell lines were once made from an aborted embryo. Nevertheless, all of these cell lines still are an extremely valuable and indispensable resource. Most medicines, vaccines and even potential cures for cancer could not have been developed without such cell lines. The question is therefore, is it morally acceptable to benefit from an act that one may believe to have been immoral? The abortion issue is complex and Christians, in good conscience, can take different and opposing views. For those who are willing to approve abortion in some circumstances, such as to save the life of the woman bearing the embryo, then using some of the tissue to achieve a good end, may be entirely acceptable. Others, who believe all abortions are immoral, face a more complex decision. In some ways the problem may be a choice of the lesser of two evils. In other ways, it involves deciding to what extent we can isolate ourselves from the world which engages in all sorts of immorality. Should we, for example, object to the use of chemotherapy to treat cancer because its effects were discovered from the use of poison gas developed to kill people? Would it be right to deny the treatment to a loved one or any other “neighbour” because of how it was obtained? It must surely be the loving thing to do to bring good out of a particular circumstance without, in general, using the end to justify the means.
No two moral issues are identical and the issue for Christians concerned about the abortion issue, in respect of the vaccine, is how to decide between two principles. The first is Christ’s call to love and protect “our neighbour” and the second is to respect life in all its stages of development. We cannot change the past nor completely isolate ourselves from a world of people so affected by sin. We can, however, choose the better outcome for those for whom we are now responsible – the vulnerable elderly, those with underlying health conditions and others most at risk from COVID-19. This directs us to encourage Christians to take the vaccine for the greater good. Ultimately, however, the choice is a matter for our individual conscience before God, let us pray that we make the right choice.
Professor Paul Ewart is professor of physics at Oxford University and Chairman of Christians in Science.
Dr Mirjam Schilling is a research scientist in virology at the Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford
To Print – click here for a PDF version
A number of CiS members took part in Justin’s survey. (Justin spoke at our AI conference in Bristol 2018. ) To read his findings or download the PDF please click here.
Café Théologique welcomes John Bryant, emeritus professor of Cell and Molecular Biology at Exeter University. (John is a former CiS Chairman.)
John is interviewed by Revd Dr Mark Laynesmith about his life and work as a biologist and Christian, his thoughts on reconciling evolution and theology, and his reflections on COVID-19.
The video is on YouTube – please click here.
Einstein’s scientific theories are famously difficult to understand for most people and he is quoted as saying that explanations should be “as simple as possible … but no simpler.” Simple explanations are hugely attractive and simplicity is often seen as a characteristic of a theory’s validity. And yet, Einstein’s warning is also valid, for when an explanation becomes too simple, as it may, then it can cease to be an explanation at all.
Theological theories are no less prone to the dangers of over simplification and when they mutate into doctrines then they risk becoming unhelpful. The current pandemic of Covid-19 caused by the corona virus can be explained scientifically but it is also raising theological questions. Questions like, “Why is this happening?” or “Where is God in this disaster?” are receiving public explanations from respected Christian leaders and apologists.
I fear, however, that some of these are just too simple and raise more questions than they answer. Of course, such questions are neither new nor specific to the corona virus. The “standard” answer being given – that we live in a “fallen world”, is also not new, but I believe it needs to be re-examined in the light of Scripture and the teaching of Christ.
The idea of “the fall”, as is well-known, is based mostly on the first three chapters of Genesis and an enigmatic passage in Romans chapter 8, where Paul speaks of Creation being subject to futility and, in the context of hope of future glory, its being “set free from its bondage to decay.” (Romans 8:21)
The Genesis message is of a world made “good” by its Creator and yet now, in our experience of natural disasters or a pandemic, it looks far from good. The simple conclusion is that a world that was once perfect has been spoiled as a result of human sin – the curse put upon the ground by God following Adam’s disobedience. The explanation is thus that suffering, including the present pandemic, is God’s response to human sin. “Simples” as Orlov the meerkat would say!
Following St Augustine, the Christian church has gradually taken this idea to be a basic doctrine rather than just a theological theory. But is it really biblical? How does it fit with the rest of the Bible and, more importantly, with what Christ says about human suffering? The truth is that there is very little else in the Old Testament, the Hebrew Scriptures, to support the idea and it has no place in Jewish theology.
The book of Job is pretty clear that poor Job did not suffer because of his sin. Nonetheless the idea persisted that human suffering from such things as congenital blindness (John 9:1,2) or being killed by a collapsing tower (Luke 13:4) are divine punishment. And yet, Jesus explicitly rejects this simple explanation. Things are more complicated and more subtle than that. Jesus tells us that these things are opportunities to experience the grace of God’s work in our lives. (John 9:3)
We are not given tidy explanations of why the world is the way it is.
Genesis teaches us that the world was made good, and good in the sense of being fit for purpose rather than perfect as we might understand perfection. The whole of the Bible is surely an account of how men and women experience God’s grace in the ups and downs of life, its pain as well as its joys. It is by finding the grace of God in an uncertain world that faith grows to maturity. Job was given no simple answer to his question, “Why is this happening to me?” Instead of reasons he finds a relationship with his Creator and vindication of his faith that his redeemer lives and that in his flesh he shall see God. (Job 19:26)
This pandemic, like so many things in life, presents us with a puzzle, but we are reassured by Paul that, “For now we see in a mirror, dimly, [or in a riddle] but then we will see face to face. Now I know only in part; then I will know fully, even as I have been fully known.” (1 Corinthians 13:12). Christ, above all, teaches us that our faith is not a matter of knowing what we cannot understand; it is, instead, trust in a loving God who will make all things well. Our task is to work in the suffering world using God’s gift of science and show the love of Christ to all.